Suppose a business in Georgia sets up a web site advertising its services. A competitor company in Illinois sues the Georgia firm in Illinois court, claiming that the service being offered is a sham that injures the Illinois firm. The Georgia company:
A) would not be subject to the jurisdiction of the Illinois courts
B) would be subject to the jurisdiction of the Illinois courts if the web page appeared on computer screens in Illinois
C) would be subject to the jurisdiction of the Illinois courts if Illinois had a long-arm statute
D) would be subject to the jurisdiction of the Illinois courts so long as the amount in controversy exceeded $100,000
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q348: If property that is located in a
Q349: In rem jurisdiction gives state courts jurisdiction
Q350: In Blimka v. My Web Wholesalers an
Q351: In rem jurisdiction can include jurisdiction over:
A)
Q352: Which kind of property could not be
Q354: State courts may clearly exercise jurisdiction over
Q355: In Blimka v. My Web Wholesalers an
Q356: As the Supreme Court has explained, for
Q357: In rem jurisdiction gives state courts jurisdiction
Q358: A state court can exercise jurisdiction over
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents