In Blimka v. My Web Wholesalers an Idaho resident, Blimka, ordered a large quantity of jeans from My Web, a Maine company that advertised its goods on the Internet. When a dispute arose over the quality of the jeans, Blimka sued My Web in Idaho state court. My Web contended the Idaho court did not have jurisdiction. The Idaho high court held that:
A) the defendants' actions did not satisfy minimum contacts with respect to the fraud allegations
B) Blimka could sue the defendants because they started the business in Idaho and then moved it to Maine
C) the defendants did not visit Idaho often enough for Blimka to sue them in an Idaho Court
D) Blimka could sue the defendants in Idaho because the defendants owned property in Idaho
E) none of the choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q345: An Idaho resident bought a large quantity
Q346: An Idaho resident bought a large quantity
Q347: If property that is located in a
Q348: If property that is located in a
Q349: In rem jurisdiction gives state courts jurisdiction
Q351: In rem jurisdiction can include jurisdiction over:
A)
Q352: Which kind of property could not be
Q353: Suppose a business in Georgia sets up
Q354: State courts may clearly exercise jurisdiction over
Q355: In Blimka v. My Web Wholesalers an
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents