In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid the export of natural minnows, to help protect the state's natural resources. When this law was challenged, the Supreme Court announced a test of constitutionality that did not include which provision:
A) whether another rule could be used to achieve the same purpose without discriminating against interstate commerce
B) whether another rule would have a more beneficial impact on the state
C) whether the rule was evenhanded with only incidental effects on interstate commerce
D) whether the rule serves a legitimate local interest
E) all of the other choices were part of the rule announced
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q202: Which of the following state statutes were
Q203: According to the Supreme Court, an Oklahoma
Q204: Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona concerned whether
Q205: According to the Supreme Court, an Arizona
Q206: In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid
Q208: In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid
Q209: In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid
Q210: In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid
Q211: In South-Central Timber Development v. Wunnicke, concerning
Q212: States may not copy federal regulations if:
A)
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents