In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid the export of natural minnows, to help protect the state's natural resources. When this law was challenged, the Supreme Court announced a test of constitutionality that did not include which provision:
A) whether another rule could be used to achieve the same purpose without discriminating against interstate commerce
B) whether the rule was evenhanded with only incidental effects on interstate commerce
C) whether the rule serves a legitimate local interest
D) the specific choices are all correct
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q204: Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona concerned whether
Q205: According to the Supreme Court, an Arizona
Q206: In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid
Q207: In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid
Q208: In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid
Q210: In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid
Q211: In South-Central Timber Development v. Wunnicke, concerning
Q212: States may not copy federal regulations if:
A)
Q213: In Hughes v. Oklahoma, the Supreme Court
Q214: In Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona, concerned
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents