In Parish v. ICON, where a person was severely injured when jumping on a trampoline and sued its maker and the maker of a safety net for failure to warn, the Iowa high court held that the manufacturers were not liable because:
A) trampolines are commonly known to be unavoidably dangerous
B) the is no requirement to provide warnings on products classified as toys
C) Parish was over 18 and thus should be held as a responsible adult
D) the warnings provided by the manufactures were adequate
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q265: Risk-utility balancing refers to the fact that:
A)
Q266: If the manufacturer provides adequate warnings, as
Q267: In Parish v. ICON, where a person
Q268: When considering the risk-utility balance, courts consider:
A)
Q269: The Restatement (Third) of Torts on product
Q271: The Restatement (Third) of Torts refers to
Q272: In Parish v. ICON, where a person
Q273: The Restatement (Third) of Torts on product
Q274: The Restatement (Third) of Torts on product
Q275: To minimize the likelihood of being liable
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents