If the manufacturer provides adequate warnings, as in the case of Parish v. ICON, where a person was severely injured when jumping on a trampoline and sued its maker and the maker of a safety net for failure to warn, consumers:
A) can still sue for failure to warn, but are limited in the amount of damages they can recover
B) cannot sue for failure to warn
C) can recover up to half their medical bills from the manufacturer
D) cannot negotiate for damages outside of court
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q261: When considering the risk-utility balance, courts consider:
A)
Q262: The Restatement (Third) of Torts on product
Q263: In Parish v. ICON, where a person
Q264: To avoid being sued for failure to
Q265: Risk-utility balancing refers to the fact that:
A)
Q267: In Parish v. ICON, where a person
Q268: When considering the risk-utility balance, courts consider:
A)
Q269: The Restatement (Third) of Torts on product
Q270: In Parish v. ICON, where a person
Q271: The Restatement (Third) of Torts refers to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents