In Parish v. ICON, where a person was severely injured when jumping on a trampoline and sued its maker and the maker of a safety net for failure to warn, the Iowa high court held that the manufacturers were not liable because:
A) trampolines are commonly known to be unavoidably dangerous
B) the is no requirement to provide warnings on products classified as toys
C) Parish was over 18 and thus should be held as a responsible adult
D) the warnings provided by the manufactures were not adequate, but Parish was being reckless
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q258: In Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Greenman
Q259: The case that led in adopting a
Q260: As stated by the California high court
Q261: When considering the risk-utility balance, courts consider:
A)
Q262: The Restatement (Third) of Torts on product
Q264: To avoid being sued for failure to
Q265: Risk-utility balancing refers to the fact that:
A)
Q266: If the manufacturer provides adequate warnings, as
Q267: In Parish v. ICON, where a person
Q268: When considering the risk-utility balance, courts consider:
A)
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents