In Smith V

In Smith v. Kulig, Smith was killed when visiting his friend who rented an apartment from Kulig, when the fire escape at the back of the building collapsed under Smith, the courts held that:

A) Smith was a trespasser on the premises and Kulig had no duty to protect him
B) Smith was not a trespasser on the premises, but Kulig still had no duty to protect him
C) Smith was a trespasser on the premises, but Kulig still had a duty to protect him
D) Since Smith was illiterate, the no trespassing signs were ineffective and Kulig was liable
E) none of the other choices are correct