In Sowers v. Forest Hills Subdivision, Sowers wanted to build a wind turbine to generate electricity. His neighbors opposed the construction and took Sowers to court. The courts held that:
A) the city failed to follow its ordinances regarding construction of turbines, so the matter had to be reviewed by the city before the courts could take the case
B) public policy favors alternative energy, so the wind turbine would be allowed
C) an injunction would be issued against building the wind turbine as it is a nuisance
D) the turbine would be allowed if Sowers could prove that noise from it would not disturb people in the neighborhood
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q241: In Atkinson v. City of Pierre, Atkinson
Q242: The tort defined as the intentional and
Q243: Your next door neighbor plays his stereo
Q244: A(n) _ an unreasonable interference with a
Q245: In Sowers v. Forest Hills Subdivision, Sowers
Q247: When someone has interfered with the right
Q248: Your next door neighbor plays his stereo
Q249: In Sowers v. Forest Hills Subdivision, Sowers
Q250: Thoni Manufacturing disposes of its waste water
Q251: A public nuisance involves an unreasonable interference
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents