In Sowers v. Forest Hills Subdivision, Sowers wanted to build a wind turbine to generate electricity. His neighbors opposed the construction and took Sowers to court. The Nevada high court held that:
A) the turbine was a nuisance
B) the turbine was not a nuisance
C) the turbine cast a shadow on neighbor's land, which was a trespass
D) the turbine could be built only if surplus electricity from it was credited to neighbors who otherwise would receive no benefit from it
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q244: A(n) _ an unreasonable interference with a
Q245: In Sowers v. Forest Hills Subdivision, Sowers
Q246: In Sowers v. Forest Hills Subdivision, Sowers
Q247: When someone has interfered with the right
Q248: Your next door neighbor plays his stereo
Q250: Thoni Manufacturing disposes of its waste water
Q251: A public nuisance involves an unreasonable interference
Q252: The tort of _ occurs when someone
Q253: The tort defined as the intentional and
Q254: Your neighbor burns old tires in his
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents