In Orkal Industries v. Array Connector, where Orkal bought parts from Array by sending an order form, but Array confirmed with its own form that contained different terms. Orkal did not object to the different terms until litigation arose later at which point the added terms mattered. The appeals court held that under the UCC a seller cannot change material terms of an order without express permission..
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q46: The statutes of frauds provision of the
Q47: Article 2 uses the common law rule
Q48: Under the UCC, if a party modifies
Q49: Under Article 2's statute of frauds, the
Q50: Like the common law, the UCC provides
Q51: In Orkal Industries v. Array Connector, where
Q52: Under the common law of contracts, unlike
Q53: Under the UCC, an offeror may not
Q55: A contract can exist under the UCC
Q56: Under the UCC, when a "battle of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents