In Orkal Industries v. Array Connector, where Orkal bought parts from Array by sending an order form, but Array confirmed with its own form that contained different terms. Orkal did not object to the different terms until litigation arose later at which point the added terms mattered. The courts held that under the UCC:
A) the buyer, Orkal, controlled the terms, so the original order form controls the contract
B) the buyer, Orkal, would have to provide new consideration for any change in the terms of the original contract
C) the seller, Array, controlled because Orkal's form contained major defects that made it fail as sufficient to create a contact
D) the seller, Array, controlled because under UCC 2-207, a sellers terms always control
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q223: Under the common law, contract modifications must
Q224: According the UCC's statute of frauds all:
A)
Q225: To be a valid contract, the writing
Q226: To satisfy the Statute of Frauds under
Q227: Under the UCC, oral testimony:
A) may contradict
Q229: According the UCC's statute of frauds all:
A)
Q230: Andrea offered to buy apricots from Aramos.
Q231: To satisfy the Statute of Frauds under
Q232: Under the common law, contract modifications must
Q233: With respect to parol evidence and the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents