Andrea offered to buy apricots from Aramos. The offer was for 10 tons at $1.20 per pound to be transported to Andrea's warehouse in Aramos trucks. Aramos accepted the offer, but said that the goods would be transported in Andrea's trucks. A dispute later arose and Aramos refused to sell the apricots, asserting that no contract existed. If Aramos sues, it:
A) wins because agricultural products are outside the scope of the UCC
B) wins because his acceptance changed terms from the original offer by Andrea
C) loses because Aramos never got specific permission to change the terms of the initial offer
D) loses if it can be shown that Aramos did not offer new consideration for the transportation modifications to the contract
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q225: To be a valid contract, the writing
Q226: To satisfy the Statute of Frauds under
Q227: Under the UCC, oral testimony:
A) may contradict
Q228: In Orkal Industries v. Array Connector, where
Q229: According the UCC's statute of frauds all:
A)
Q231: To satisfy the Statute of Frauds under
Q232: Under the common law, contract modifications must
Q233: With respect to parol evidence and the
Q234: Suppose two parties to a contract that
Q235: Balls, Inc. sells all baseballs needed by
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents