In Ironite Products v. Samuels, where a major shareholder (Samuels) of Ironite sued, contending the bylaws had been violated, the appeals court held that:
A) there was no fraud, the directors followed the rules, so he had no suit
B) while there was no fraud, the directors did not follow the bylaws properly, so the changes made to the corporation would have to be reconsidered
C) the bylaws had been violated, so Samuels was due full fair market value of his shares
D) the directors violated their duty to the corporation so would be removed from control and Samuels would take control of the company
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q294: A corporation in which the shares are
Q295: _ are those with stock traded on
Q296: Which of the following occur after the
Q297: A _ is one whose shares are
Q298: A close corporation is one:
A) with a
Q300: Which of the following statements about a
Q301: In Ironite Products v. Samuels, where a
Q302: Shareholders of a corporation:
A) manage the corporation
B)
Q303: At a shareholder meeting, there must be:
A)
Q304: A corporation consists of:
A) shareholders
B) board of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents