In Ironite Products v. Samuels, where a major shareholder (Samuels) of Ironite sued, contending the bylaws had been violated, the appeals court held that:
A) the bylaws had been violated because the Companies' bylaws did not clearly sanction the Board of Directors to manage the business and affairs of the company
B) the bylaws had been violated because the Companies' bylaws clearly sanctioned the Board of Directors to manage the business and affairs of the company
C) the bylaws had not been violated because the Companies' certificate of incorporation clearly sanctioned the Board of Directors to manage the business and affairs of the company
D) the bylaws were never properly approved and so there was no case for violation of bylaws
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q296: Which of the following occur after the
Q297: A _ is one whose shares are
Q298: A close corporation is one:
A) with a
Q299: In Ironite Products v. Samuels, where a
Q300: Which of the following statements about a
Q302: Shareholders of a corporation:
A) manage the corporation
B)
Q303: At a shareholder meeting, there must be:
A)
Q304: A corporation consists of:
A) shareholders
B) board of
Q305: The board of directors of a corporation
Q306: A corporation consists of legally distinct groups,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents