In Bearden v. Wardley Corp., where real estate agent Gritton cheated Bearden on a house deal, the court held that his employer, Wardley, was not liable because it had no way to know of his actions.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Bearden v. Wardley Corp., the court held that Wardley Corporation was liable for the actions of its employee, Gritton, under the doctrine of respondeat superior, because Gritton was acting within the scope of his employment when he committed the fraudulent acts.

In Bearden V