In Yin v. J's Fashion Accessories, the court found that Yim was an agent for his company, Hosung, so was not liable for debts owed by Hosung, the principal.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Yin v. J's Fashion Accessories, the court found that Yim was personally liable for the debts owed by Hosung because he was acting as the principal, not merely as an agent for the company.

In Yin V J's Fashion Accessories, the Court Found That Yim Was