In Yim V J's Fashion Accessories, Inc

In Yim v. J's Fashion Accessories, Inc., where J's Fashion sued Yim for failing to pay for goods he bought under the name Ho Tae and Yim denied liability on the grounds that he had been acting as an agent for Hosung Enterprise, Inc which also did business under the name Ho Tae, the courts held that:

A) Yim was not liable because he was an agent of Hosung Enterprise, Inc.
B) Yim was not liable, even though he was an agent of Hosung Enterprise, Inc.
C) Yim was liable because he disclosed Hosung Enterprise, Inc. as the principal
D) Yim was not liable because he had apparent authority
E) none of the other choices are correct