In Yim v. J's Fashion Accessories, Inc., where J's Fashion sued Yim for failing to pay for goods he bought under the name Ho Tae and Yim denied liability on the grounds that he had been acting as an agent for Hosung Enterprise, Inc which also did business under the name Ho Tae, the courts held that Yim was liable because:
A) the duty to disclose the principal is on the agent and Yim did not disclose Hosung Enterprise, Inc. as the principal
B) the duty to disclose the principal is on the third party and J's Fashion did not disclose Hosung Enterprise, Inc. as the principal
C) Hosung Enterprise, Inc. was a limited liability company and so could not be held liable
D) Yim made the contract without identifying Hosung Enterprise, Inc. as the agent
E) Yim unlawfully disclosed Hosung Enterprise, Inc. as the principal
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q312: An undisclosed principal is:
A) known to the
Q313: In Yim v. J's Fashion Accessories, Inc.,
Q314: An undisclosed principle is:
A) known to the
Q315: Cook instructs Chan, her agent, to buy
Q316: A(n) _ is one whose identity is
Q318: The principal may hold the third party
Q319: When there is an undisclosed principal, the
Q320: When an agency is terminated:
A) the agent's
Q321: In France v. Southern Equipment Co., where
Q322: _ is a person who contracts with
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents