Geary was an employee of U.S. Steel. His concerns about the safety of a new product were ignored by his superior. He went to higher management to let them know of the problem. The product was withdrawn from the market, but Geary was fired by his superior. Geary sued the company for wrongful dismissal. The Pennsylvania court held that Geary:
A) wins because he was protecting the public against harm, which outweighs the private interest here
B) wins because his employment rights can be lost only after due process
C) wins because management agreed with Geary's assessment of the product; the supervisor was wrong
D) loses because of the employment-at-will doctrine
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q343: An employee of a company, who has
Q344: Anna hires Jack to paint her house.
Q345: Which of the four general factors which
Q346: When an employer-employee relationship exists, employers:
A) may
Q347: Employment-at-will:
A) allows employees to quit their jobs
Q349: Suppose a car dealership hires people to
Q350: Under the common law doctrine of _,
Q351: Which of the four general factors which
Q352: Traditionally, the chief difference between an agent
Q353: Under the common law doctrine of _,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents