In Zambelli Fireworks Manufacturing Co

In Zambelli Fireworks Manufacturing Co. v. Wood, where Zambelli sued Wood for violating the noncompete agreement in his contract, the appeals court held that:

A) the noncompete agreement was void because it violated common law policies
B) the noncompete agreement was void because it violated public policy
C) Wood's specialized knowledge from working at Zambelli, but not customer goodwill, constituted a legitimate business interest that Zambelli had a right to protect through a reasonable restrictive covenant
D) Wood's specialized knowledge from working at Zambelli and established customer goodwill did not constitute legitimate business interests that Zambelli had a right to protect through a reasonable restrictive covenant
E) none of the other choices are correct