In Teamsters Local Union No. 523 v. National Labor Relations Board, where a sales representative complained of unfair labor practices after he was demoted by the union when his employer consolidated its distribution so that the union would represent all distribution workers, rather than only some, the U.S. Court of Appeals held that:
A) the employee was behind in his agency fee payments, so he had no claim to keeping his position
B) the employee should have to join the union or pay agency fees if he wanted to keep his seniority position
C) the union and employer were discriminating against the employee, but not in a way that encouraged union participation
D) the union and employer were not discriminating against the employee in a way that encouraged union participation
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q507: A strike against an employer other than
Q508: The workers at a meat packing plant
Q509: A primary boycott is:
A) a strike that
Q510: The workers at a meat packing plant
Q511: Protected concerted activities under the NLRA, that
Q513: A secondary boycott, in general, is:
A) a
Q514: In Teamsters Local Union No. 523 v.
Q515: Workers will not be protected under the
Q516: If the union refuses to take an
Q517: To promote productive collective bargaining, Congress provided
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents