In EEOC v. Dial Corp., where Dial used a weight lifting test to see if people were qualified to do the work needed at a factory, and the EEOC said it discriminated against women, the appeals court held that:
A) such tests of strength are discriminatory against women, so are illegal as disparate impact
B) such tests of strength are part of a bona fide occupational qualification, so are legal
C) the test was used as a form of harassment toward women
D) the test used here was a good predictor of ability to do the job, so it was legal
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q340: Which of the following could be used
Q341: Disparate impact discrimination cases are _ than
Q342: In general, to require job applicants to
Q343: In general, to require job applicants to
Q344: Employment practices that discriminate against some employees
Q346: In bringing a suit charging an employer
Q347: An employer may legally provide differential treatment
Q348: Disparate impact discrimination cases are _ than
Q349: Sam owns Speedy Bricklayers, Inc., a company
Q350: In EEOC v. Dial Corp., where Dial
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents