In Chuway v. National Action Financial Services, where Chuway received a letter from debt collector National that requested payment of the amount she owed on a debt, the appeals court held that the debt collector:
A) violated the FDCPA by sending the plaintiff multiple letters after she requested they stop
B) used reasonable language for the situation and so did not violate the FDCPA
C) did not violate the FDCPA because the language of the letter was clear
D) clearly used safe harbor language and so did not violate the FDCPA
E) none of the other choices are correct

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The specific details of the Chuway v. National Action Financial Services case are not provided in the question, making it impossible to accurately determine which of the given choices is correct based on the information provided. Therefore, without specific details about the case or the appeals court's ruling, "none of the other choices are correct" is the most appropriate answer.

In Chuway V