The jury concluded that the driver of the brown car ran a red light at the intersection of Maple Drive and First Street while proceeding south on Maple Drive. Joan testified that she was driving her blue Toyota and headed west on First Street. She further testified that, as she approached Maple Drive, the light was green and that, as she proceeded through the intersection, a brown car collided with her Toyota. The jury accepted Joan's testimony and concluded that the driver of the brown car negligently caused the collision. Evidence shows that Bob is the owner of the brown car. Based on these facts alone, was Bob negligent?
A) Yes, because Bob is the owner of the vehicle.
B) Yes, because the driver of the brown car was negligent.
C) No, because Joan should not have driven through the intersection at that time.
D) No, because no evidence shows that Bob was the driver of the brown car.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: You work for an attorney who is
Q3: A brown car ran a red light
Q4: Joe is a paralegal who has worked
Q5: Mary is a paralegal who works for
Q6: Jill is a paralegal who works for
Q7: Paula is a paralegal and is reviewing
Q8: Mary works for an attorney who handles
Q9: Bill works for the law firm of
Q10: Bill is a senior paralegal with the
Q11: For the past ten years, Carolyn has
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents