Critically appraised topics and critically appraised papers are two methods with which occupational therapy is promoting evidence-based practice techniques. Which of the following statements is true regarding these two articles?
A) A critically appraised topic is distinguished from a critically appraised paper in that the critically appraised topic is recognized as having the best available evidence.
B) Both are less rigorous versions of systematic reviews.
C) A critically appraised paper contains a quantitative analytical summary of the findings from the available literature.
D) A critically appraised topic contains only studies of experimental designs.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Critically appraised topics (CATs) and critically appraised papers (CAPs) are indeed less rigorous than systematic reviews. Both CATs and CAPs are tools used in evidence-based practice to quickly assess the validity and applicability of research findings to clinical questions. Systematic reviews, on the other hand, involve a more comprehensive and detailed analysis of all relevant studies on a particular topic, following a predefined protocol.

Critically Appraised Topics and Critically Appraised Papers Are Two Methods