Discuss Conant's ideological and political-economic justifications for the system of tracking or ability grouping. In your opinion, are these justifications consistent with John Dewey's democratic ideal of ensuring the "all-around growth of every member of society"? Defend your view.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Conant's ideological and political-economic justifications for the system of tracking or ability grouping are rooted in the belief that it is necessary to sort and separate students based on their abilities in order to provide them with the most appropriate education and to prepare them for their future roles in society. Conant argued that tracking would allow for more efficient and effective education, as it would enable teachers to tailor their instruction to the specific needs and abilities of each group of students. He also believed that tracking would help to maintain social order and stability by ensuring that students were being prepared for their future roles in the workforce and society.

In my opinion, these justifications are not consistent with John Dewey's democratic ideal of ensuring the "all-around growth of every member of society." Dewey believed in the importance of providing all individuals with equal opportunities for growth and development, and he emphasized the value of a comprehensive and well-rounded education for all. Tracking or ability grouping, on the other hand, can lead to unequal opportunities and limited growth for students who are placed in lower tracks or groups. It can also perpetuate social and economic inequalities by limiting the opportunities available to certain groups of students.

Furthermore, tracking can also have negative effects on students' self-esteem and motivation, as they may internalize the belief that they are not capable of achieving at higher levels. This can have long-term consequences for their educational and professional aspirations. Instead of sorting and separating students, Dewey advocated for a more inclusive and equitable education system that would provide all students with the support and resources they need to thrive and reach their full potential.

In conclusion, Conant's justifications for tracking or ability grouping are not consistent with Dewey's democratic ideal of ensuring the all-around growth of every member of society. Instead, they perpetuate inequality and limit opportunities for certain groups of students. A more democratic and equitable approach to education would prioritize the needs and potential of all students, rather than sorting and separating them based on perceived abilities.

Discuss Conant's Ideological and Political-Economic Justifications for the System of Tracking