In which case did the Supreme Court rule that in addition to the suspicion required to justify a stop, the officer must have reasonable suspicion that the person stopped is ?armed? and ?dangerous? before a frisk can be conducted?
A) Payton v. New York
B) Adams v. Williams
C) Terry v. Ohio
D) Maryland v. Buie
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Reasonable suspicion is a standard of justification:
A)
Q3: Reasonable suspicion is:
A) Concerned with substantive due
Q4: Which standard of justification is necessary for
Q5: Stops and frisks are considered _ acts.
A)
Q6: Which of the following can be said
Q8: A frisk must be supported by reasonable
Q9: What type of test has the Supreme
Q10: Factors that may elevate a nonstop to
Q11: The Supreme Court has condoned stops lasting
Q12: Which factors has the Supreme Court considered
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents