Which factors has the Supreme Court considered in determining the appropriate duration of a stop?
A) The public interest served by the seizure
B) The nature and scope of the intrusion
C) The objective facts upon which the law enforcement officer relied
D) All of the above
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: In which case did the Supreme Court
Q8: A frisk must be supported by reasonable
Q9: What type of test has the Supreme
Q10: Factors that may elevate a nonstop to
Q11: The Supreme Court has condoned stops lasting
Q13: A frisk requires:
A) Reasonable suspicion that a
Q14: Concerning the scope of a frisk, the
Q15: Frisks must be directed at discovering:
A) Contraband.
B)
Q16: A valid frisk can evolve into a
Q17: Which of the following are considered restrictions
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents