Using the concepts developed in this chapter, discuss the Supreme Court's ruling in Grutter v. Bollinger and in Gratz v. Bollinger using the following questions to guide your discussion. Did the court come to seemingly different conclusions for similar causes? Do you agree with the court's decision in each case? Defend your position.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is In the cases of Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger, the Supreme Court came to seemingly different conclusions for similar causes. In Grutter v. Bollinger, the Court upheld the University of Michigan Law School's affirmative action admissions policy, stating that the use of race as a factor in admissions was narrowly tailored to achieve the compelling interest of diversity in education. On the other hand, in Gratz v. Bollinger, the Court struck down the University of Michigan's undergraduate admissions policy, which awarded a specific number of points to minority applicants, finding that it was not narrowly tailored and amounted to a quota system.

The seemingly different conclusions can be attributed to the specific details and implementation of the affirmative action policies in each case. In Grutter, the Court found that the law school's holistic review of applicants, which considered race as one of many factors, was narrowly tailored and did not result in a quota system. However, in Gratz, the undergraduate admissions policy's automatic awarding of points to minority applicants was seen as too mechanistic and did not provide individualized consideration.

As for my personal opinion, I agree with the Court's decision in Grutter v. Bollinger. I believe that diversity in education is a compelling interest and that the law school's affirmative action policy was narrowly tailored to achieve this interest without creating a quota system. However, I also agree with the Court's decision in Gratz v. Bollinger. I believe that the undergraduate admissions policy, which relied on a points system for race, was not narrowly tailored and did not provide individualized consideration for applicants.

In conclusion, while the Court's rulings in Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger may seem different, they were based on the specific details and implementation of the affirmative action policies in each case. I believe that the Court made the right decisions in both cases, as they upheld the importance of diversity in education while also ensuring that affirmative action policies are narrowly tailored and do not result in quota systems.

Using the Concepts Developed in This Chapter, Discuss the Supreme