Crystal purchased a specific, fully functioning widget from Husker Du Inc.She promised to pay the price of $10 000 within one month.As part of a promotional campaign, Husker Du agreed to deliver the widget to her factory for free.Husker Du Inc.delays shipping the widget to Crystal's place as it forgets about the order.During that delay Husker Du's employee carelessly left its truck unlocked on the street during his lunch break.The widget was stolen from the truck and has never been recovered.Husker Du nevertheless insists that Crystal had already acquired property in the widget by the time of the theft and that she therefore was required to honour her promise to pay $10 000.Is that argument correct? Did property pass to Crystal? Is she required to pay the price? Explain your answer.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q65: Hiram is about to agree to sell
Q66: On May 1, Suneel entered into a
Q67: Explain the basic differences between: (i) a
Q68: The Sale of Goods Act applies only
Q69: Zounds Sounds, a music store, ordered 20
Q71: Sareena has owned and operated her own
Q72: Discuss the significance of a buyer's reasonable
Q73: "The Sale of Goods Act was intended
Q74: Hamish entered into a contract with Shania.Under
Q75: The Sale of Goods Act applies only
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents