Paolo has just resolved three different disciplinary cases involving tardiness issues with three different employees. Each employee was given a different disciplinary action. One employee received a written warning, one employee received an informal talk, and another received suspension or layoff. Which of the following circumstances would warrant such action on the part of Paolo?
A) Nothing would warrant such differences in treatment.
B) The employees got along differently with Paolo.
C) One worker was from a protected group, and Paolo didn't like one of the others.
D) The three employees had different records of previous offenses of the same nature.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q54: Which of the following violates the principle
Q55: Employees at the department level will take
Q56: Which of the following is generally considered
Q57: The hot stove rule includes:
A) Advance warning.
B)
Q58: When confronted with disciplinary problems from employees,
Q60: Which of the following statements regarding an
Q61: Last week, Alfonso had a friendly talk
Q62: Which disciplinary approach uses counseling and coaching
Q64: Providing advance warning to employees who may
Q66: What is positive discipline? Positive self-discipline?
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents