In Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona, concerned whether Arizona could, for safety considerations, require trains traveling through the state be a shorter length than trains traveling through other states. The Supreme Court held the Arizona law was valid:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Supreme Court actually held the Arizona law invalid in Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona, ruling that it placed an undue burden on interstate commerce, thus conflicting with the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution.