In New York v. Burger, a junkyard owner claimed that a New York statute permitting warrantless searches of junkyards was a violation of the 4th Amendment. The Supreme Court held that the statute was:
A) constitutional because to hold otherwise would leave the Commerce Clause meaningless when regulation is "clearly necessary"
B) constitutional because it met the criteria necessary for a warrantless search of a closely regulated business
C) an unconstitutional violation of the Fourth Amendment since the police failed to obtain judicial approval for the searches
D) an unconstitutional violation of the exclusionary rule
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q341: In Marshall v. Barlow's, where the Occupational
Q342: The Fifth Amendment protects individuals against:
A) self-incrimination
Q343: Based on the Fourth Amendment, the exclusionary
Q344: Improperly gather evidence:
A) is not allowed in
Q345: Individuals are protected from self-incrimination by:
A) the
Q347: Improperly gathered evidence violates:
A) Fourth Amendment rights
Q348: Individuals are protected from self-incrimination by:
A) the
Q349: In New York v. Burger, a junkyard
Q350: Which of the following is a key
Q351: "No person shall be...compelled in any criminal
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents