In U.S.v.Young,where government agents put Federal Express packages to Young under an x-ray to look at the contents,and he was convicted partly based on that evidence,the appeals court held that:
A) the conviction was overturned because there was no warrant to x-ray the packages
B) the conviction was overturned because Federal Express violated customer privacy rights
C) the conviction was upheld because the severity of the crime outweighed the usual requirement to obtain a warrant
D) the conviction was upheld because there was no need for a warrant
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q80: In Commonwealth v.Angelo Todesca Corp.where Angelo Todesco
Q85: In U.S.v.Young,where government agents put Federal Express
Q207: In a criminal case, if evidence is
Q208: If David flees the country to avoid
Q215: If the statute of limitations expires on
Q220: The statute of limitations:
A) varies with time
B)
Q223: You are arrested by the police, who
Q226: If the chain of custody is broken
Q231: In cases where a person is charged
Q239: Unjust searches are violations of:
A) privacy interests
B)
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents