In U.S.v.Young,where government agents put Federal Express packages to Young under an x-ray to look at the contents,and he was convicted partly based on that evidence,the appeals court held that:
A) there was no need for a warrant because Young assumed the risk that Federal Express might consent to a search
B) there was a need for a warrant because Young assumed the risk that Federal Express might consent to a search
C) there was no need for a warrant because Young did not assume the risk that Federal Express might consent to a search
D) there was a need for a warrant because Young did not assume the risk that Federal Express might consent to a search
E) none of the other choice are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q80: In Commonwealth v.Angelo Todesca Corp.where Angelo Todesco
Q83: In U.S.v.Young,where government agents put Federal Express
Q207: In a criminal case, if evidence is
Q208: If David flees the country to avoid
Q212: In a criminal case, if evidence is
Q223: You are arrested by the police, who
Q226: If the chain of custody is broken
Q231: In cases where a person is charged
Q233: Under the exclusionary rule:
A) improperly gathered evidence
Q239: Unjust searches are violations of:
A) privacy interests
B)
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents