In Gretillat v.Care Initiatives,where Gretillat sued for disability discrimination because her physical problems made it difficult for her to perform her job and she was forced to quit,the appeals court held that she:
A) had no suit because despite her physical problems she was not disabled
B) was disabled but incapable of doing the job,so had no cause of action
C) was disabled and her employer must find another position she is capable of performing
D) was disabled and her employer failed to provide reasonable accommodations
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q270: In Gretillat v.Care Initiatives,where Gretillat sued for
Q272: In Gretillat v.Care Initiatives,where Gretillat sued for
Q425: Which of the following is NOT defined
Q427: A person who has a physical or
Q428: A person who has a physical or
Q434: The Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with
Q435: Which of the following is NOT defined
Q437: Which of the following is NOT defined
Q439: Which of the following is an example
Q440: Which of the following is defined as
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents