In Peconic Baykeeper,Inc.v.Suffolk County,where an environmental group sued Suffolk County for violating the Clean Water Act by spraying pesticides from trucks and helicopters into stagnant waters to control mosquitoes,the U.S.Court of Appeals held that:
A) the trucks and helicopters were not,contrary to the district court's conclusion,point sources of pollution
B) the trucks and helicopters were,contrary to the district court's conclusion,point sources of pollution
C) there cannot be a violation of the Clean Water Act when human health is at stake
D) there was no violation of the Clean Water Act,but there was a possible violation of the Endangered Species Act
E) there was no violation of the Clean Water Act because it only applies to flowing water
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q362: Which of the following statutes concern the
Q363: Which of the following statutes concern the
Q364: Firms that have water pollution permits must
Q366: To grow cranberries, Eva used a wet
Q371: Wetlands may include such areas as:
A) prairie
Q376: One of the major challenges to dealing
Q377: Which of the following is NOT a
Q385: The practice of buying or restoring other
Q393: With regard to chemical restriction or banning
Q398: Under TSCA, the EPA is responsible for:
A)
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents