Fact Pattern 7-2. CallTalk Corporation,a smartphone and phone-time seller,chooses to use and register "calltalk" as its domain name. Later,CallTalk's less successful competitor,CellTalk Company,chooses to use and register "caltalk" (an intentional misspelling of "calltalk")as its domain name. Still later,Call&Talk,Inc.,uses the domain name "callltalk" (also a deliberate misspelling of "calltalk")without CallTalk's authorization,to sell pornographic phone conversations.
-Refer to Fact Pattern 7-2. CallTalk wants to sue Call&Talk for its unauthorized use of the domain name "callltalk" on a theory of trademark dilution. This claim requires proof that

Question

Fact Pattern 7-2. CallTalk Corporation,a smartphone and phone-time seller,chooses to use and register "calltalk" as its domain name. Later,CallTalk's less successful competitor,CellTalk Company,chooses to use and register "caltalk" (an intentional misspelling of "calltalk")as its domain name. Still later,Call&Talk,Inc.,uses the domain name "callltalk" (also a deliberate misspelling of "calltalk")without CallTalk's authorization,to sell pornographic phone conversations.
-Refer to Fact Pattern 7-2. CallTalk wants to sue Call&Talk for its unauthorized use of the domain name "callltalk" on a theory of trademark dilution. This claim requires proof that

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Trademark dilution does not require proof of consumer confusion or similarity of products, but rather that the use of a similar mark diminishes the distinctiveness of the original mark.