Carlos has been sued for the tort of negligence while working at SKS Logistics.He failed to inspect his truck and missed seeing a failure in the brake line that caused him to get in an accident.Which of the following is true?
A) SKS is not vicariously liable if the have liability insurance.
B) The plaintiff can only sue SKS if they specifically told Carlos not to check the brakes.
C) Carlos cannot be sued because he was on the job;SKS bears all the risk.
D) The plaintiff should sue both Carlos and SKS under the doctrine of vicarious liability.
E) Carlos should be sued for the tort of deceit for lying about having working brakes.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q38: Which of the following statements is true
Q39: Which of the following statements is TRUE
Q40: Beverley,who is a Canadian judge,has just heard
Q41: Paine Enterprises sued Montesquieu Corp.in tort.The court
Q42: Abdul worked for Primus Finance Co.Following a
Q44: Case Brief 3.2 discusses the Supreme Court
Q45: Ethical Perspective 3.1 discussed the Supreme Court
Q46: Gold Star Investment Inc.is in the business
Q47: Jojo suffered a catastrophic injury while she
Q48: Pierre has just won a court case
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents