Chasya Rented a Widget from Alec

Chasya rented a widget from Alec.During the rental period,the widget was involved in an accident.Which of the following statements is TRUE?

A) The parties' rights with respect to the accident are probably governed by the Sale of Goods Act.
B) Since the transaction was not intended to transfer title,Alec could not have been required to warn Chasya with respect to the use of the widget.
C) If the widget was damaged during the accident,Chasya necessarily will be treated as an insurer.
D) If the accident was caused by the fact that the widget was defective,Chasya may be entitled to recover damages for personal injuries that she suffered during the accident,but only if Alec actually knew of the defect before providing Chasya with possession of the widget.
E) If Alec sues for the damage done to the widget,the court may shift the burden of proof by requiring Chaysa to prove that the damage was not her fault.