Frieda is working on a construction site when she is injured on the job in the collapse of a Girder Company-made ceiling beam. At the time,Frieda is not wearing a hard hat or any other safety gear. In Frieda's product liability suit against Girder,the company can most successfully raise the defense of

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Comparative negligence is a defense used in product liability cases where the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to their injury. In this case, Frieda was not wearing any safety gear, which could be seen as negligence on her part. Therefore, Girder Company could raise the defense of comparative negligence to argue that Frieda's failure to use appropriate safety gear was a contributing factor to her injury.

Frieda Is Working on a Construction Site When She Is