Since 2005,more than 40 states have passed or proposed new "Castle Doctrine" legislation intended to expand the right to use deadly force in self-defense.Some argue that these new laws are the expression of one's "right to defend" while others argue that they are a "license to kill." Explain each argument and make your own argument for one side or the other.

Question

​Since 2005,more than 40 states have passed or proposed new "Castle Doctrine" legislation intended to expand the right to use deadly force in self-defense.Some argue that these new laws are the expression of one's "right to defend" while others argue that they are a "license to kill." Explain each argument and make your own argument for one side or the other.

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of ​Since 2005,more than 40 states have passed or proposed new "Castle Doctrine" legislation intended to expand the right to use deadly force in self-defense.Some argue that these new laws are the expression of one's "right to defend" while others argue that they are a "license to kill." Explain each argument and make your own argument for one side or the other.

​Since 2005,more Than 40 States Have Passed or Proposed New

Since 2005,more Than 40 States Have Passed or Proposed New