Eric testified for the plaintiff in a racial discrimination lawsuit brought by a female employee against their employer,Sincere Bank.He did this even though his manager advised him to not get involved.Shortly thereafter,Eric was fired.Which of the following is the most likely outcome in this scenario?
A) Eric has no case for retaliatory discharge because he is not a member of the protected class.
B) Eric has no case for retaliatory discharge because he was merely testifying on behalf of someone else and this is insufficient involvement to get protection under anti-discrimination law.
C) Eric may use the bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) defense to file a discrimination case against Sincere Bank.
D) Eric may have a case because Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects an employee who participates in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing on a colleague's complaint of discrimination.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q40: Maker Goods Inc.has a published workplace policy.It
Q41: Distinguish the business necessity defense from the
Q42: Describe legal resources available on the Internet.
Q43: Kellie was employed with the Western Phone
Q44: Describe the business necessity defense to a
Q45: Which of the following is true of
Q46: Explain the public policy exception to the
Q47: Which of the following questions is least
Q48: At Innov8 Systems Inc.'s office,Ahmed's workstation is
Q49: If an employee in an Equal Employment
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents