Sally Smith is a well-known thief that specializes in stealing checks from mailboxes as well as writing bogus checks for items from retail stores. Her violations ranged from $25 to $3000 worth of merchandise fraudulently purchased with stolen checks. Sally is arrested for the tenth time for committing this type of crime. She had stolen checks from a retired couple living in the country. The couple was easy prey. Sally simply dressed as if she were out for a jog along the roadside and stopped by the retired couple's house under the pretense of needing a glass of water. The retired couple allowed Sally to come into their house while she drank her water. Sally notices a checkbook lying on the kitchen counter and shoves it inside her t-shirt when the opportunity arises. Sally thanks the couple for the water and then walks down the road to her car. She returns to the metropolitan area and buys a $150 dress from a small store in a nearby mall. Sally is caught in the process. The district attorney decides to make an example of Sally and pursues the case in conjunction with 15 other similar cases filed against Sally. The district attorney pursues life imprisonment because of Sally being a habitual criminal that preys upon the elderly. Sally is convicted and receives a life sentence with parole after 15 years. Sally appeals her case based on the fact that the crime was only a misdemeanor offense. If this case makes it to the Supreme Court, what will be the probable outcome? If the outcome affirms the original sentence, explain why? If not, why? Do you agree that habitual misdemeanor criminals should receive harsh sentences?
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q42: _ is a clause in the Fourteenth
Q43: _ is a principle found in the
Q44: In Beauharnais v. Illinois, a man was
Q45: The First Amendment literally forbids the abridgement
Q46: The _is often expressed through the Latin
Q48: _ is an interpretation of the U.S.
Q49: Common law offers one distinct advantage in
Q50: Alberto attended a demonstration by Mexican-Americans in
Q51: In many states verbal provocation is insufficient
Q52: Discuss the ex post facto law prohibition
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents