How are oral history interviews regarded by Institutional Review Boards? Oral history interviews
A)must be carefully reviewed because people are sharing intimate details of their lives.
B)do not need review because they do not contribute to generalizable knowledge.
C)must be reviewed if the subject matter is sensitive.
D)do not need review because the interviewee is in control of what he or she shares.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Oral history interviews are generally not considered to contribute to generalizable knowledge in the way that research studies do. They are often viewed as capturing specific, individual experiences rather than attempting to draw broader conclusions that apply to a wider population. Therefore, they may not fall under the purview of Institutional Review Boards in the same way that more traditional research studies do.

How Are Oral History Interviews Regarded by Institutional Review Boards