Stella bought a cup of coffee at the drive-through window at a coffee shop.Holding the cup between her knees and attempting to take off the lid to add cream,she spilled the coffee.She suffered burns to her thighs.If this happened in Canada,which of the following is true?
A) If Stella sues the coffee shop for negligence, she will only have to prove that the company owed her a duty of care.
B) If Stella sues the coffee shop, the company's best argument is that it didn't owe her a duty of care.
C) To succeed with the defence that she volunteered to take the risk, the coffee shop would have to prove that she deliberately spilled the coffee.
D) If the coffee shop claims there was no way to reasonably foresee that Stella would be harmed, the plaintiff's case would be dismissed even though she suffered burns.
E) If the court finds the plaintiff contributorily negligent causing 60 percent of her loss, she must suffer that portion of the loss and will not be compensated for it by the defendant.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q4: Raheel wants to sue a manufacturer who
Q5: Which of the following is true with
Q7: Mr.Reasoner was looking out his livingroom window
Q8: Which of the following situations could not
Q10: Creative Farming Ltd.manufactures fertilizer from organic matter,a
Q11: As a result of careless driving,Mr.Boz accidentally
Q12: Two real estate agents,pressed for time,stopped at
Q13: In Hall v. Hebert, an individual was
Q13: Sarah Iris,a middle-aged woman,was struck down as
Q14: Which of the following statements with regard
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents