Services
Discover
Homeschooling
Ask a Question
Log in
Sign up
Filters
Done
Question type:
Essay
Multiple Choice
Short Answer
True False
Matching
Topic
Political Science
Study Set
Comparative Politics Study Set 2
Quiz 1: Introduction
Path 4
Access For Free
Share
All types
Filters
Study Flashcards
Practice Exam
Learn
Question 21
Multiple Choice
A greater focus on collective equality is associated with:
Question 22
Essay
What changes in the world, and in the United States' place within it, helped give rise to modernization theory and behavioralism in comparative politics? How do the two approaches differ from each other, and how are they similar?
Question 23
Essay
Should comparative politics simply describe and explain politics around the world, or should it seek solutions to political problems? What might be some of the benefits or dangers of the latter approach?
Question 24
Multiple Choice
The substance of politics is inevitably bound up in the struggle between:
Question 25
Multiple Choice
In which of the following ways did behavioralism differ from modernization theory?
Question 26
Multiple Choice
A greater focus on individual freedom is most likely to require:
Question 27
Essay
Why has it been so difficult to create a science of comparative politics? Is it simply because this area of study is relatively new, or are there fundamental obstacles that will always limit what we can know?
Question 28
Multiple Choice
In which of the following ways can multicausality affect comparative politics research?
Question 29
Multiple Choice
In which of the following ways does quantitative research differ from qualitative research?
Question 30
Essay
Describe the debate about whether or not qualitative or quantitative methodology is better for studying comparative politics.How has this evolved over time? How does a mixed-methods approach fit into this debate?
Question 31
Multiple Choice
To a comparativist, which would be of more value: discovery of a correlation or discovery of a causal relationship? Why?
Question 32
Not Answered
How strongly is democracy institutionalized in your country? Has its level of institutionalization changed over time, and how difficult would it be to de-institutionalize democracy? What formal structures support its institutionalization?