In Sogeti USA LLC v.Scariano,the case in the text,the court held that:
A)express consent of an employee is not required before an employer's contractual rights can be assigned to,and enforced by,a successor company.
B)Martinez violated the noncompetition provision that he agreed to with SARK.
C)a noncompetition provision can only ever be assignable when the contract containing the provision contemplates its assignability.
D)public policy requires an employee's consent before an employer's contractual rights can be assignable.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court held that express consent of an employee is not required before an employer's contractual rights can be assigned to,and enforced by,a successor company.

In Sogeti USA LLC V