In Johnson v.Bank of America,N.A. ,the case in the text,the court held that:
A)the contractual duty was delegable because it did not materially change the benefit of the bargain and Johnson did not have any interest in Bank of America performing the contract.
B)the contractual duty was delegable because delegations in the trade were common.
C)the contractual duty was not delegable because Fiserv had an improper financial motive.
D)the contractual duty was not delegable because it was prohibited by statute.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court held that the contractual duty was delegable because it did not materially change the benefit of the bargain and Johnson did not have any interest in Bank of America performing the contract.

In Johnson V